The given bar chart illustrates how many vehicles were owned by 1000 people in China, during the period between the year 1987 to 1999.
It shows a steep slow progression initially from 1987 to 1993 with less than 300 at 1987 to approximately 1000 vehicles for 1000 people in 1993, Interestingly, an abrupt rise in the number of vehicles is noticed starting from the year 1995 as it got doubled to reach 2000 vehicles per 1000 people, which as much as the overall rise on vehicles numbers through the preceding 6 years. After which the upstroke continues at a steady rate every two years, with about 3000 vehicles per 1000 people at the year of 1997 comprising 1000 vehicles rise in 2 years, then lastly, it reached it`s highest point with 4500 vehicles for 1000 people at the year 1999.
In conclusion, China car ownership nearly doubled 15 folds in 12 years timescale with a sharp upstroke starting by the year 1995.
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownerships in China. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 73
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required? 39
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 61
- Space tourism: Will it bring positive or negative effects on the world's development? Give your own opinion. Use example based on your experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...e, which as much as the overall rise on vehicles numbers through the preceding 6 years. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70987654321 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46824829729 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.217334598 43.030603864 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.75 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.5 22.9334400587 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133273254884 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902184630429 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273176743128 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974813985264 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300307905861 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.26 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.93 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.