The bar graph reveals the number of meat and coffee in kilograms consumed by each person per year in Norway, France, Germany, United States of America, Russia, China and Japan.
It is noticeable that USA has the highest number of meat consumption, while, Japan recorded the lowest figure. Further, Norway has a high number of coffee consumption, on the other hand, China has the least number.
Highlighted on the graph, USA has a record of 122kgs which has the highest number, while, Japan has 42kgs as the least amount of meat consumed. Countries like Germany, France, Norway, Russia and China has recorded 87, 72, 60, 45 and 47kgs respectively. Coffee consumption was relatively low in all countries. Norway recorded the highest figure of 9kgs and China has the least amount of coffee consumed, at 2kgs. France and Russia has equal figure of coffee consumption, at 5kgs. In addition, Germany, USA and Japan has recorded 5, 4 and 3kgs each respectively.
To sumup, meat consumption was relatively high in all given countries, while coffee consumption was low in all countries throughout the year.
- Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. 78
- Some people think that teaching methodology in the modern classroom should be based on experiental learning. While others believe that traditional approach is still the best. 61
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ticeable that USA has the highest number of meat consumption, while, Japan record...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t consumption, while, Japan recorded the lowest figure. Further, Norway has a hi...
^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ption, while, Japan recorded the lowest figure. Further, Norway has a high numbe...
^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... recorded the highest figure of 9kgs and China has the least amount of coffee con...
^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igure of coffee consumption, at 5kgs. In addition, Germany, USA and Japan has rec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08241758242 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68384518871 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0028570262 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183473978555 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854516597512 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608863615419 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118815296818 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262194884345 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.