The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants

Given are the bar chart contrasting the number of people joining different evening classes at an adult education center in the year 2009 as well as the pie chart delineating the aged which were joining in the course.
Perceptibly, the number of females was far higher than that of males in Language, Drama and painting, while the opposite was true for sculpture. . As information supplied from the other figure, the proportion of people over 65s was by far the highest while people who was under 18 years old was the least.
Sharing a similar in the number of females double males in Language and Drama subject with 40% and 20%, the contrary for Sculpture in the number of males accounted for 20%, painting which consisted 30% and 25 in the number of women and men.
When it comes to the proportion of the people over 65s ranked first in the number attendees with 42%, Second in terms of the rates of the under-20s at 26%, The percentage of people in their twenties equal to the rates of people in their thirties and people in their fourties with 11% and 5%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar chart contrasting the number of...
^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le the opposite was true for sculpture. . As information supplied from the other ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58421052632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37525597743 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9570199325 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.2 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17270166087 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977803761305 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117397490644 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11708932962 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123970876086 0.0819641961636 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.