The given figure represents information about expected life longevity over the period from 1950 to 2300.
As is shown in the illustration, the majority of trends are upwards. In most Asian countries predicted lifetime more than doubles from average 40-50 in 1950 to 90-100 in 2300.
The initial significant steep growth was during 1950-2025 in all Asian regions, then it steadied and spanned for the next decades.
Eastern Asia region showed the longest life expectancy throughout the whole time period. It was approximately 53 in 1950 and forecasted to be risen up to 105 in 2300.
South-central Asia had the lowest life longevity in 1950 and is predicted to peak at likely 77 in somewhere between 2050-2100 then reach more than 90 in 2300, similarly to Western Asia, India and China. Their trends are alike, except for China, who felt gradual dips and rises in 1950-2000. Eventually, it is said that China will prolong its lifespan.
On the whole, all Asian regions have same pattern and inevitably will increase lifetime.
- The bar chart gives us the information about the life expectancy in Japan ,Korea, United states and Indonesia and the table shows us the change in the life expectancy between 1953 and 2008. 78
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 85
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 71
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 43, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'patterned'.
Suggestion: patterned
... the whole, all Asian regions have same pattern and inevitably will increase lifetime.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, then, except for, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65241288597 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676470588235 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.672987989 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101561580191 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415330614951 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712209713392 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580570060855 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07255090121 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.