The bar charts compare the percentage of people living in London who voted what things made them feel good or bad over three years. Meanwhile, the line chart illustrates the proportion of people from London rating what the worst thing was when living in the city.
Looking at the bar charts, it is immediately apparent that when it comes to the good things in London, people instantly thought of a variety of shops over the period shown. By contrast, the worst things were the cost of living and traffic congestion. Moreover, litter was the main problem in the city.
The variety of stores was the best thing that people rated when living in London, at over 40%. The figures for job opportunities and mixture of people are lower, just over 35%. By contrast, the statistics on the museums and art galleries, nightlife, and transport were the lowest, at under 25%. Talking about the worst things in London, the cost of living, traffic congestion, and crime accounted for above 40%. While 35% of people rating the mixture of people and the cost of housing, and the figure for transport was only 25%.
Looking at the line chart, it is evident that litter is the main issue in London, which its percentage increased from 70% in the first year to approximately 75% in the second year, then decreased to about 68% in the third year. By contrast, the figures for air quality and noise fell to around 63% and 52%, respectively in three years.
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 76
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 71
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 74
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, then, third, while, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73412698413 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39457412931 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496031746032 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2664752757 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4166666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218110556059 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833907632227 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667755501807 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148292692313 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647505271527 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.