the chart below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit.
The line diagram gives information about the visits to and from the UK over two decades, and the bar diagram illustrates the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999. At a glance, there is a gradual increase in the number of visitors, UK residents and overseas residents, travelling to and from the UK.
Looking in the line graph, the visitors, citizens of UK and abroad residents, have reached summits in 1999 while the nadir points of both was in 1979. The zenith of the abroad visits by UK residents was approximately 55 million which differs from overseas travelers to UK significantly by around 30 million.
The bar diagram projects the information that UK residents, travelling to abroad, have travelled more to the France (around 11 million) followed by the next popular country: Spain (around 9 million). Although there were less number of visitors from UK who visited USA and Greece, least visited to Turkey in 1999 (approximately 2 million).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Shidbi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Stephen Halolo | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Stephen Halolo | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Saahaar | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Oanhlucy | 56 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 61
- the chart below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas on 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01242236025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8015107775 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.1032928668 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 134.5 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427417713301 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224736836289 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13861943433 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314083777509 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159521893575 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.