The given bar chart provides information about the number of million tons of rice
produced yearly by 4 different nations over 3 years 1995, 2005 and 2015.
What stands out from the chart is that the total amount of rice created in all three
years of the two countries A and B has reached a larger scale than that of the
other two nations. While rice production in A and D increases over the years,
countries B and C tend to fluctuate.
Looking at the chart for more details, the annual rice production of country A was
the highest among countries, this figure leaped steadily each year and until 2015
it peaked at 50 million tons. Along with this upward trend, in country D the
amount of rice generated in the first 2 years remained stable at 2 million tons, but
later increased slightly by 2 million tons.
Besides, the rice production of country B ranked the second, which oscillated in
three years and touched the highest point at around 48 million tons during 2005.
Country C had an annual rice production was 5 million tons in 1995, then 10 years
later it rose slightly to 7 million tons and in the last year it fell to the same level as
the first year.
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer de 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54205607477 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33566341947 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.526470899 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.857142857 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310811713593 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162785607635 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515412348924 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112106681911 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914162144936 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.