The bar chart makes a comparison of the average regular higher and lower level of two particular objects which caused air pollution in four megacities in 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that Mexico City was in the top place for carrying the highest amount of both pollutant particles, while Los Angeles had the least N20.
To begin with Los Angeles and Mexico, the latter city had the highest level of min SO2 than all other cities which was 80, whereas, the former had level 2. The same trend for max SO2 in the case of Los Angeles, it was one-twentieth of Mexico City. Mexico City the level of max N2O was 207, on the other hand, Los Angeles had half of its level. In the case of min N20 which was three times higher than Los Angeles and the level was 113.
Turning to the other two cities, in Calcutta, the level of both max and min SO2 was 47 and 59 respectively. However, Beijing had half in case of min SO2 but more than twice in case of max. The level of min N2O was doubled than Beijing, while in the case of maximization both were almost similar levels.
- The environmental problems that today s world is facing are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation So governments and large organizations should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the envi 73
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below 78
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 73
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35294117647 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1596906595 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504901960784 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7005696549 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131263367272 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687150031671 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871158482767 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113490373394 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109147595558 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.