The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the rate of five different types of post-school qualification in Australia according to males and females during 1999.

It is clear that a much higher proportion of men had a skilled vocational diploma in comparison with women in this country. Additionally, the rate of males gaining an undergraduate diploma and bachelor’s degree was lower than female’s figure.

The percentage of men achieving a skilled vocational diploma was highest, at over 90%, while the figure for women was significantly lower, at nearly 10%. The gap of postgraduate diploma between two genders was less dramatic, men’s figure accounted for 70%, compared to 30% of women. Moreover, 60% and 40% of master degree were gained by male people and female citizens respectively.
In contrast, more than 70% of people having an undergraduate diploma were women, whereas 40% of them were men. In addition, there was a small gap of people who achieved a bachelor’s degree. The figures for men and women stood at around 45% and 55% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27218934911 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17006277442 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627218934911 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.634178573 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146514247562 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661863691766 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619960404933 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108272425836 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616389472196 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.