The chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005.
The chart indicates the estimation of trips by purpose was taken by female and male car- drivers in 2005. Overall, it is clear that there was a dominant trend in traveling to work than other purposes and that more women drove than their opposite sex.
In 2005, there was an estimated over 50% of men driving to work, which accounted for the highest proportion overall, compared to just 10% lower of women. Similarly, the same pattern repeated for visiting town and recreation car trips conducted by more men than women drivers, with nearly 10% as opposed to just 2% and over 10% compared to 3%, respectively.
In contrast, men had a tendency to drive for 4 remained purposes less than their counterpart. While nearly 10% of female drivers took trips for banking, running errands and visiting friends, men showed a much lower percentage of just around 3% in total. There was 18% and 11% of women drove to shop and take courses, with a comparison of 3% lower each to men.
- Different materials recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 43
- Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Immigration in UK 67
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extentdo you agree or disagree? 61
- Topic The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 92
Comments
Thank you very much!
Thank you very much!
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69590643275 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47363582273 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8517355058 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207224467369 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111613939247 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157945789411 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145137384449 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718219980988 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.