The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000

The given bar chart depicts a comparison of illiteracy rates referring to gender between six aggregated geographical areas in 2000.
Overall, the proportions of uneducated men and women in developed countries were much lower than in other compared regions. Additionally, the share of illiterate people among females were generally significantly higher than among males in all estimated areas.
The most obvious thing is that the highest rates of uneducated people were revealed mainly in developing countries. While the number of illiterate men there was close to estimated 30%, the utmost rates of untaught females were recorded in South Asia, Arab States and Sub-Saharan Africa with about 55%, 52% and 48% respectively.
On the contrary, the rates of illiteracy in East Asia & Oceania and Latin America & Caribbean were noticeably lower. Although there was a slight difference between uneducated men and women in Latin America/Caribbean, roughly 10% and 12% each, the number of illiterate females in East Asia/Oceania amounted to 20%, which was almost twice as high as the statistics for males. Eventually, the lowest number of unschooled people of both genders was in developed countries, where it was registered to be just over 2 % in women and 1% in men.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportions of uneducated men and women in developed countries were much lower t...
^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han among males in all estimated areas. The most obvious thing is that the highe...
^^^
Line 4, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istered to be just over 2 % in women and 1% in men.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34170854271 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02217485089 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628140703518 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.01545975 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.875 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137613505598 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065375848262 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067563189936 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990815284276 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786836302998 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.