The bar graph elucidates the estimated world illiteracy proportion by different regions and by gender in the year 2000.
Overall, males are more educated than females. In developed countries, the ratio of illiteracy is the lowest, However, the Latin American and Caribbean region had 10% of illiteracy among males and 1% more in females, while, In East Asia regions females are not as much educated and had 11% of the gap as compared to males.
Sub-Saharan Africa and the Arab States had similar illiteracy in terms of males which is 30%, Additionally, it is much higher in the females up to 49% and 51% respectively. Lastly, South Asia had the highest illiteracy in the female population of 54% and 32% in the male population.
Therefore, the developed countries had the most educated population in both genders. In contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Arab States, and South Asia had a drastic gap to access education by males and females. The other two, Latin America and East Asia had average differences among males and females to get an education.
- Is it good for children to start using computers from an early age and spend long hours on them? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 67
- some people thing that the government should establish free libraries in each town other believe that it is the waste of money since people can access the internet at home to obtain information Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting on the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- There is huge increase in the size of cities. Many cities have grown in a haphazard way why is careful planning important in the development of cities? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, so, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02272727273 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78555156489 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1482657599 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137858353656 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752588662829 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133133373097 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138523160899 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162704603347 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.