The bar chart compares the proportion of spending of two countries in France and the UK in 2010, the amount of money spent on five consumer goods( cars, computers, books, perfume, and cameras). Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Overall, it is clear that the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France in the period given. Both the British and the French spent most of the money on cars, while the amount of money was spent on perfume was cameras in France compared to perfume in the Uk.
In terms of, people in the UK spent about 450,000 pounds on this opposed to the Frech at 400,000 pounds. Similarly, the percentage of spending computer in the British was higher than the French, at around 410,00 pounds and 300,000 pounds, respectively. In addition, above 370,000 pounds of money spent on the computer while the French were rose significantly, at around 350,000 pounds.
On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods was higher in France. Around 360,000 pounds was spent by the British on cameras which were decreased sharply more than the French exactly 200,000 pounds. In addition, the countries spent much on perfume which accounted on for 200,000 pounds of expenditure in France but under 150,00 pounds in the UK.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 33
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies 82
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Units are measured in pounds sterling. Overall, it is clear that the UK spent m...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificantly, at around 350,000 pounds. On the other hand, the amount of money p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81105990783 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37771942442 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456221198157 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.719796932 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108219637281 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593821072467 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907989530961 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954551842089 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100083480201 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.