The bar chart compares the spending of consumers in France and the UK in terms of 5 different kinds of stuff in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that people in the UK had a tendency to spend more money on goods than French did. In addition, both citizens in two examined countries showed their most preference on cars.
To begin with, the expenditure of the UK on consumer goods surpassed the other nation regardless of car, book and camera categories. To be more explicit, people poured the majority of their budget into cars, with 450000 pounds sterling by English and only 400000 pounds sterling by French. In general, consumers also allocated relatively large proportions of their incomes to books. While the amount of money used for buying books in France was 300000 pounds sterling, the figure for the UK was considerably higher than that, at about 400000 pounds sterling. Similarly, the number of cameras consumed by the UK gained the turnover at around 350000 pounds sterling in 2010, nearly twice as much as the figure for France.
In contrast, the trend was reversed for France in terms of computers and perfume groups. There was a slight difference in the spending on computers in 2 countries. Computer users in France invested approximately 380000 pound sterling in this type of goods, whereas the figure for people in UK was lower, at 350000 pound sterling. Meanwhile, perfume was paid for at least among 5 shown goods, the budget for buying perfume in France and the UK were 200000 and about 150000 pound sterling respectively.
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 79
- Some people believe that it is essential to include physical education classes in the curriculum for all school age children Others think that children s time is better spent on more academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 73
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, at least, in addition, in contrast, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90038314176 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55819367873 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547892720307 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5336303928 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.583333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133299789973 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580415588809 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696141507909 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107261667142 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684871258115 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.