The information about how often people in the USA ate in junk food hotels from 2003 to 2013 is depicted by the rendered bar chart. The data has been calibrated in the percentage of people.
To begin with, in 2003, 4% of people ate fast food in hotels on a daily basis. However, the percentage of people who were eating frozen food at hotels every day was 3%, from 2006 to 2013. The proportion of individuals who were going to eat junk food at restaurants several times a week in 2003 was nearly 17%. Although there had been a drastic increase seen in 2006, it was 20%, but the figure was similar in 2013 and 2003. The percentage of the population who were going to eating house once a week was 31%. 33% and 27% of people were eating fast food at hotels one time in a week in the year of 2006 and 2013 respectively.
Moving towards, from 2003 to 2013, a drastic fluctuation was noticed in the proportion of the population of the USA who ate packaged food at eating house one or two times in a month, it accounted for 33% in 2013. In 2003, 13% of people were eating at the fast-food hotel a few times a year. Moreover, there was the same number of people between 2006 and 2013, it comprised to 15%. In addition, only 5% or below 5% of people were never going to the fast-food house from 2003 to 2013.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that fewer people in the USA who ate junk food at eating house throughout the span.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.26838235294 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32103540294 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444852941176 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3897378082 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3076923077 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249685962388 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116768441369 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783025201259 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184386152702 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595736636123 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.