The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The change in how frequent consuming fast food at restaurants among the USA population from 2003 to 2013 is displayed by the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the figure for people eating this food once a week was the highest. However, the frequency of consumption in a few times a year increased, while that for others showed some trends.
Initially, there had been almost a third of Americans eating fast food once weekly, being higher than monthly consumers at only 30%. Meanwhile, the other time frequency proportion had accounted for below a fifth, with the percentage of daily eaters had observed at the lowest, at less than a twentieth.
Eventually, the two figures reveling an incline was yearly and monthly fast-food consumers by around 3% and 4%, respectively. Furthermore, both proportion of those attending this restaurant to dine in either several times or once in seven days decreased to closely a seventh and a quarter, running. Additionally, ones who never and every day ate these diets remained at the same rate.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 84
- The table below shows the estimated literacy rates by region and gender for 2000 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06395348837 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80256078334 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697674418605 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9740250044 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161107616319 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686232507281 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777471114172 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110506984985 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924847036919 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.