The chart below shows how people in one European city came to the office and returned home between 1959 and 2009.
Summarize information by selecting and reporting key features, and comparing if relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of numerous methods that people prefer to travel to work and come back home in European countries from different periods 1959 and 2009.
Overall, it was significant that the majority proportion of people’s travelling methods was on foot in 1959 and by car in 1959. Moreover, it was also crucial that the average distance and average duration were increased through the time.
According to the proportion of European people’s transportation, it was clearly be seen that residents in Europe had various way of travel. First of all, it is clearly be seen that individuals who went to work on foot and came back to hoe by the same methods made up the highest percentage from all sections, which was approximately 55%, more than half of given statistic but then it was slightly decreased to 25% in 2009. Second, it was pointed up from the pie chart that there was a rapidly increase in the percentage of car using in Europe, from 10% in 1959 to 35% in 2009, which was nearly as three times higher percentage as the previous one. Other sections which were related in the pie chart accounted for the minor proportion and created a huge gap between the top and the bottom features.
On the other sides, it was surprising that the average duration and average distance were increased after the period. The time that people had to spend on travelling was 17 minutes in average in 1959 while in 2009 was 42 minutes. Another striking feature was considerable to be mentioned was the average distance that European people was travelling. It was almost as six times higher percentage as itself in 50 years previously, which was respectively 3.5 km and 19 km.
- The chart below shows how people in one European city came to the office and returned home between 1959 and 2009 Summarize information by selecting and reporting key features and comparing if relevant 61
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 61
- The bar chart shows the average price of a house in the UK in different years The pie chart shows the percentage between owners people renting and those with second homes 44
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rapidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ed up from the pie chart that there was a rapidly increase in the percentage of car using in Europ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es higher percentage as the previous one Other sections which were related in the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 7.0 343% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 292.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70205479452 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6256829438 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462328767123 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 292.0 22.4926829268 1298% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1373.0 112.824112599 1217% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 292.0 22.9334400587 1273% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 69.0 5.23603664747 1318% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118802748053 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118802748053 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952644145518 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438853848031 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 146.7 13.2329268293 1109% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -207.98 61.2550243902 -340% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 114.8 10.3012195122 1114% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.46 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.26 8.06136585366 264% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 118.8 10.9970731707 1080% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.