The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the variation in the cost of houses in five separated areas in two spans of periods, 1990 – 1995 and 1996 – 2002 compared with the prices of the year 1989.
Overall, over a period of 12 years, the majority of cities witnessed an upward trend in average house prices except Frankfurt.
Looking at the detail, between 190 -1995, in comparison with 1989, the prices of houses in Tokyo and London decreased dramatically by the same percentage which was approximately 7%, whereas New York declined by only 5%. By contrast, the other cities which were Madrid and Frankfurt saw minuscule increase of about 1% and 2% respectively.
The cost of houses in 5 cities has significantly changed in the second period, from 1996 to 2002. The expenditure on houses in London raised considerably by 12% and 19% when compared with 1989 and the period of 1990-1995 properly. New York and Madrid has also the similar trend in average house prices with an increase of 5% and 4% appropriately. The cost of house in Tokyo still reduced by 5% but the decline rate for previous period shrank by 2 percentage points. Frankfurt grew only 1% and this is the only city which underwent a decrease in the prices of houses during a period of 12 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-18 | John256 | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-26 | sasachic10 | 89 | view |
- 7.Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The cots of international travel are decreasing and tourism is growing What are the advantages and disadvantages of increasing tourism activity in different countries 95
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the totalsupply in 2000, 2004 and 2007. 61
- Studies show that many criminals have a low of education For this reason people that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can ge a job when leave prison Do you agree or disagree 66
- The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall a public place for hiring over the period of three years 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75342465753 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66970646784 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552511415525 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.663972965 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321503154428 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140435492999 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611542548504 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204122601121 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508393690648 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.