The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented bar graph elucidates how many passengers are transported by 3 various main airports in New York City, namely John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark over the period of six years, starting from 1995 to 2000. Units are measured in millions of passengers for each one year.
The most striking feature to be observed is that, in the number of passengers who travelled via LaGuardia and Newark airports experienced an upward trend, except for John F. Kennedy. In addition, the LaGuardia accounted for the highest quantity of travelers in terms of the transportation throughout this period.
Looking at the data in more details, it is evident that there was a significant upsurge for John F. Kennedy airport transportation in the first 3 years, in which, stood at about 26m in 1995 and then increased remarkably to reach the highest point of 47m in 1997. In 1999, the figure plunged tremendously to 32m and at the last year, traveler numbers rose to 44m. On the other hand, LaGuardia began at 35m in 1995, after that it rose remarkably for the next four years, at 50m. In 2000, LaGuardia hit the peak point at 68m travelers.
Turning to rest of description, Newark airport started at the lowest point of 16m passengers in the first year. After this point, the trend increased significantly to 42m in 1998. In the last two years it remained stable at 42m travelers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-26 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2005 2015 and future projections for 2025 71
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada. 11
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 84
- The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, except for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84745762712 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.751145592 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584745762712 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6472065986 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994470419423 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369728270366 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330478292787 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646450430887 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333135609099 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.