The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided chart illustrates the yearly number of trips to and from school that has been made by children in a particular country in the years 1990 and 2010, with different transportation types.
Overall, the most traviling mode children prefered in 1990 was walking, while car passanger occupied the highest rate in the year 2010.
In 1990, using a car in order to transport the children to school was the least throughout the period as it was arround 5 Millions trip. However walking has been reached to almost 6 million trips, cycling was common used in this period as it exceeded 6 millions trip. Using Bus is higher than 6 million as it almost 7 million school children were using the buses. Walking merged to the highest point in this period as it exceeded 12 million in the year 1990.
In the year 2010, using cars were higher than other modes of the transportations as it reached to about 11 millions, while walking and using bus were 6 and 5 millions respectively. Cycling and walking to bus was the lowest use of travelling to school as they scored 2 millions for cycling and almost 3 for walking to bus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | HASAN.511 | view | |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 79 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Water pollution 56
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 67
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 100
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65829145729 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56947601954 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48743718593 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5289054399 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225062774057 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117567917969 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867924052551 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164687664822 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915631002325 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.