A glance at the given bar graph reveals a number of striking differences on how many people were living in an own house and a rented home in the countries, England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. The horizontal axis depicts various years from 1918 to 2011 whereas vertical axis presents percentage of households.
At the first glimpse, it is quite obvious that the proportion of rented households slashed considerably over the time, while the number of owned households increased significantly.
One particularly interesting fact to note is the number of rented accommodation decreased over the time. During the starting year, the number of households which were rented were at the highest of 78 percent approximately. However, this figure decreased dramatically, where only 36 percent of households were rented in 2011.
With regards to own accommodation, the number of own houses saw a rise over the years. Starting from almost 22 percent in 1918, the number of own household accommodation increased dramatically upto 70 percent. But in the next decade, there was a slight decrease of just 3 percent in the number of own houses.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 73
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 64
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccommodation increased dramatically upto 70 percent. But in the next decade, ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01328928993 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8375418333 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20309057073 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895494519375 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350272939488 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125611146565 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223137838682 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.