The given chart provides an information on the proportion of households which have owned or rented accomodation in two regions, England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. Generally there was a steady increase in the percentage of households owning the household except the year of 2011, whereas the percentage of households in rented accomodation had been decreased from 1918 to 2001.
The share of households living in owned accommodation reached its peak in 2001 at just under 70 percent, while that of households which had rented their accommodation peaked in 1918 at around 75 percent. The lowest percentage of owned accommodation was in 1918 with taking slightly more than 20 percent. On the other hand, households whose accommodation had been rented recorded the lowest percentage of slightly more than 30 percent. In 1971, the percentage of households in owned accommodation and in rented accommodation showed the equivalent figure at 50 percent. Although until the year of 2011, there were a steady increase and a decrease in the proportion of owned accommodation and rented accommodation respectively, in 2011, they showed the contrast in the trend, with a drop by around 5 percent in owned accommodation and a rise by around 5 percent in rented accommodation.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 91
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22058823529 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18970780336 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.041260521 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.142857143 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332246232519 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188351718818 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564867122219 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281064993356 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308558276925 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.