The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graph depicts the proportion of households comparing rental and owned housing in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
To begin with, rented housing was recorded as the highest ratio in 1981 with just below 80% and started decreasing. Similarly, in 1939 and 1953, it was at the equal level by roughly 78%, while in 1961, it declined by approximately 10%. By the 1971, by decreasing around 9%, it reached at the same level of owned housing percentage and declining trend was continue with roughly 10% in every given timeline. However, in 2011, the chart gradually climbed by nearly 4% and reached up to roughly 35%.
In term of owned accommodation, 1981 was recorded as the lowest with just above 20%. Afterward, it hiked slightly and reached above 30% in 1939 and 1953, again it increased by approximately 8% in 1961. Furthermore, we can see the noticeable increase in ratio from 1971 to 2001with 50% to nearly 70%. However, in 2007 the ratio slightly went to downward and accounted as roughly 65%.
Overall, as shown in the chart, the households in owned accommodation are in increasing ratio and households of rental housing are in decreasing trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | phadode | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | Aung | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | Behnaz.babayani | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | baokhanh | 84 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 82
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, similarly, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92462311558 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73279989161 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4483150667 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137980698506 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566282621946 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664763527037 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111484258297 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715947672697 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.