the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chart provides some information about households who lived either in their owned accommodations or in rented houses in terms of percentage in two countries of England and Wales during almost a century from 1918 till 2011.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, the form of families who lived in their owned places or rented dwelling can be considered as two different eras, prior 1971 and after 1971. The year of 1971 played the role of pivot in which the same percentage of households lived in owned or rented houses which was 50%. Despite the fact that families who owned accommodation were far fewer that rented-accommodation families in 1918, more than 20% and below 80%, respectively, the difference between these types of households become smaller around 40% versus 60% in 1961.
However, the pattern was reversed after 1971. In 1981 60% of families had their owned properties which was far more than 40% of rented-accommodation families. From 1991 onward till 2011, approximately the same shares were observable around 30% to 35% of households who rented their houses in comparison with nearly 65% to 70% of owned-accommodation families.
It is clear from the chart that while there was a dramatic decline in the percentage of renting accommodation during 1918 to 2001 from round 80% to 30%, it witnesses a slight climb in the 2011 to 35%. By contrast, whereas the owning accommodation in England and Wales skyrocketed drastically from above 20% to around 70% at the same course, it increased slightly to about 65% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | phadode | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | Aung | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | Behnaz.babayani | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | baokhanh | 84 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation What will cause us to achieve it 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01937984496 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08220456441 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8667843088 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.888888889 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282175325848 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124703512778 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730798643781 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196666202632 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511080597619 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.