The given bar charts display the information about the proportion of accommodation trading in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. The types of households divided into owned and rented. Overall, it is clear from the charts that rented accommodation gone down whereas owned accommodation contrasted.
The rate of rented accommodation was significantly decreased from 76 percent in 1918 to just over 30 percent in 2001. Then there was slightly increased to 36 percent in 2011.
Turning to the owned accommodation, there was dramatically rose from 22 percent in 1918 to the highest around 69 percent in 2001. After the peaking at 69 percent the following year, owned accommodation steeply fallen to 63 percent in 2011.
In the whole, households tend to buy accommodation by owning more than renting it after 1971 in which two types of accommodation equaled.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 56
- Intelligence is the most important component for leadership Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and support it with adequate examples 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...d accommodation, there was dramatically rose from 22 percent in 1918 to the highest ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 727.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23021582734 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08823372111 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4836021494 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.875 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333611819421 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151735494635 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761281309532 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206790052394 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113181030545 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.