The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the gender distribution of teachers in 6 different educational organizations, namely nursery/pre-school, primary school, secondary school, college, private training institute and university in Britain in 2010. Overall, the proportion of male teachers increased gradually whereas that of their female counterparts declined significantly.
The number of male teachers in the first two educational institutions which are nursery/pre-school and primary school made up about 3% and 5% respectively. The figure rose sharply to merely 45% in secondary school and 50% in college which was as much as that for female teachers. In the private-training institute, the number of male educators was just approximately 2% higher than the former. The greatest percentage of male teachers accounted for nearly 70% in university.
On the contrary, the largest proportion of female teachers accounted for nearly 98% in nursery/pre-school and then was followed by 96% in primary school. The number of female teachers in the next three educational settings which are a secondary school, college and private-training institution declined slightly at around 50%, 45%, and 43% respectively. The percentage of women in university experienced the lowest peak, approximately 30%, while that for men was at the highest one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The two maps show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 61
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 92
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 78
- The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK, 1999 -2008 73
Comments
Should have more complex
Should have more complex sentences and use more advanced words.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77040816327 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62793132138 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1683088444 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1412171694 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707362024712 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298267557288 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112188739375 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127170569264 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.