The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of teachers, divided by gender, in six levels of educational system in the UK in the year of 2010.
At the first glance, it is clear that the proportion of women teaching at Nursery and Primary school was greatest, while the similar pattern was seen in those of male teachers.
There were over 90% of female teachers at Pre-school and Primary school, compared to about 55% of women in Secondary school. Men did not well-liked in the first three low levels, which was particularly low, with below 10% at Nursery and Primary school. In college, both male and female teachers shared the same figure, with a half for each.
Turning to the two remaining levels, men were dominant over women. About 56% of teachers at Private training institute were male. Similarly, the percentage of women teaching at University were by far lower than that of men, with about 30%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant https iotcdn os 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theater between 2010 and 2012 67
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, similarly, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83225806452 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51626136956 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1239186689 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165012478083 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759968777365 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672520039364 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104859302524 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719892514729 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.