The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the precentage of difference place to visit of people who lives di Canada. This information divided into three groups: Canadian natives, new migrants who born in other countries and new arrive people born in English-sepaking countries.
As we can see, more than 60 percent Canadian people and English-sepaking mmigrants prefer to go to the cinema comparing to the other countries migrant that choose library to visit. For the least popular place to visit from those categories is Theatere. It is about 10 percent of migrant from other countries, 25 percent of English-native speakers and 20 percent of Canadian born.
Zoo is the second popular place for migrants, it is about 50 percent of English-sepaking migrants and above 40 percent of peoples are born in Canada. Half of new migrants who born in other countries choose cinema for their secon option to visit.
Overall, the most popular place to visit is cinema, because most of ther choose this place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-04 | cindycornelia98 | 82 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Zuna-ira | 61 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Other believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects than will be useful in the future such as those relating to the science and technology Discuss both this views 67
- International visitors to New Zealand: transport used during visit 56
- The two maps below show read access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reorting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two charts describe the number of people in various types of employment casual unemployed full time job part time job self employed and contract in 1998 and 2001 It is clear that the majority of people held a full time position in both 1998 and 2001 I
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because most of ther choose this place.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07453416149 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88485079446 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8162667852 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151069831034 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907353211781 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094216249282 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108818527487 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542522274317 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.