The bar graph gives information about the minutes of phone calls used in the UK from 1995 to 2002. Overall it can be seen that there was an increasing trend of telephonic calls by call type of “National and International” and “Mobiles” from 1995 to 2002. While in ‘Local’ call type, it has increased till 1999 and decreases in the subsequent years.
In 1995, the use of Local -fixed line was more than 70 minutes (billions) and roses to 90 minutes(billions) in 1999 and decreases thereafter to the same level of 1995. It’s a trend of increasing and decreasing was constant. Also, the trend if ‘International and National’ – fixed-line call type was constant from 1995 to 2002. It starts from approximately 38 minutes (billions) and in 2002 it was 61 minutes (billions).
In 1995, the use of Mobile was very less, but it was significantly increased from 1999 to 2001. In between 2001 and 2002 the rise was of approximately 5 minutes(millions).
- Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Recent years, the number of crimes committed by young people in major cities throughout the world has been increasing. Why this has happened and how to deal with this problem? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0736196319 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67548669621 2.65546596893 138% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1662826401 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220618533199 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112861415928 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079211605743 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155377357724 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559219938171 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.