The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
While the pie chart illustrates what graduate students in one Anthropology university did after finishing a college degree, the table compares the wages of three types of employments after working for five years.
Overall, the majority of graduates chosen full-time jobs; whereas, part-time jobs and postgrad study had the least students. In addition, the lowest percentages of anthropologists working as all three kinds of employments received from 25000 to 49999 dollars.
As can be seen from the pie chart, over half of Anthropology graduates did full-time careers, which was followed by the proportion of students choosing part-time jobs, at 15%. Also, people pursuing full-time postgrad study and not known had an identical figure, at 8%, which was 4% lower than unemployed graduates. Consequently, only 5% of students opted to both part-time jobs and pursued postgrad study.
Regarding the table, there were the same rates of freelance consultants and government sector receiving 25000-49999 dollar and 50000-74999 dollar, which accounted for 5% and 10% respectively. Nevertheless, the proportion of those working in a private company and having 50000-74999 dollar wages, at 35%, was more than twice as large as that of the government sector. Besides, the percentages of those working as freelance consultants, in the government sector, and in private companies with the most generous salary in the table were 40%, 50% and 30% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 84
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51121076233 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02575962354 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605381165919 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.724472196 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.555555556 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184049541563 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740769240733 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110285145727 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134387901814 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135771196975 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.