The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years.
The pie chart illustrates types of jobs graduates from one university did after completing an undergraduate degree course, while the table demonstrates the amounts of wages after five years of work of three types of employment.
Overall, the proportion of graduates who did full-time work was the highest among six destinations, whereas the fewest people did part-time jobs and postgrad study after finish this course. Besides, most Anthropology students in the government sector earned more than one hundred thousand dollars.
It is noticeable that the most popular kind of jobs belonged to full-time work, at 52% of Anthropology graduates. Next came the percentage of people doing part-time jobs, at 15% of graduates, which was 3% higher than unemployed people. Also, the figures for graduates who did full-time postgrad study and not known were the same, at 8% of graduates, which was followed by people who did part-time work and postgrad study (only 5% of graduates).
Regarding the table, the percentage of Anthropology graduates in private companies who earned from 25000 dollars to 49999 dollars was twice as high as that of the government sector and freelancers. Conversely, only 30% of graduates earned more than 100000 dollars went to private companies, while half of graduates doing for the government sector earned more than 100000 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers should be paid more while many people think that other people like film actors or singers should be paid huge sums of money due to the importance of the work that they do and their rol 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of resources 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, regarding, so, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34112149533 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84100236469 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528037383178 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7748143914 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.875 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212778455014 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965107172456 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101597327539 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155868345037 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116665614183 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.