The chart shows the amount of energy generated from wind in four countries from 1985 to 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the quantity of energy generated from the wind of four nations between 1985 and 2000. The data calibrated is in megawatts.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that all countries amount of energy from wind had increased except the US in the last given year, although the US was the leader of generating energy among all three nations.
Firstly in 1980 and 1990 India and Canada constructed a less energy as compare to other two countries, which was nearby 200 and 300 MW, but the quantity of energy production from wind India and Canada had experienced a rise of 800 and 1600 MW in 1995 and 2000, though it was not higher than the US contribution of energy from wind.
Secondly, the energy generated from the wind by Germany experienced a twofold increase in 1990, but after Canada surpassed the way which Germany producing the energy at the end of the period. Apparently, the US mentioned its increasing performance until 1995 nearby 1200,1630 and 1600 MW but in 2000 Canada beaten the performance of the US by the difference of 1050 MW in making energy from the wind.
- There are other things that motivate a person to work but money is the most compelling In your opinion how influential is the power of money 78
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Should children be allowed to play violent video games 73
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 90
- Should children be allowed to play violent video games 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... quantity of energy production from wind India and Canada had experienced a rise ...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia and Canada had experienced a rise of 800 and 1600 MW in 1995 and 2000, thoug...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d experienced a rise of 800 and 1600 MW in 1995 and 2000, though it was not high...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74479166667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59439311806 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0036231171 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.833333333 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425911438251 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220446304133 0.103423049105 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154541545921 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284217798858 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095128373095 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.