The chart shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.
The chart compares the number of hours of leisure time enjoyed by men and women in five different employment status from 1998 to 1999.
Overall, it is clear that men had more hours of free time than women did but they did not have any free hours when they were employed part time or when they were doing housewives.
Men who were unemployed and retired had the most hours of leisure time, at about 80 hours per week for both categories. These figures were slightly lower for unemployed women and retired women, which was about 75 hours per week for both. The number of hours that employed full time women had was 38 hours per week, lower than that of men, which was approximately 50 hours.
In term of emloyed part time and housewives, the trend was different. While employed part time women and housewives women had 40 hours and 50 hours of leisure time per week, men in the same emloyment status had no free time at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Shivam7090 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Shivam7090 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ahmadrava88 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 73
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 38
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...joyed by men and women in five different employment status from 1998 to 1999. Ov...
^^
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... any free hours when they were employed part time or when they were doing housewives. Me...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...both. The number of hours that employed full time women had was 38 hours per week, lower ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...hours that employed full time women had was 38 hours per week, lower than that of m...
^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...oximately 50 hours. In term of emloyed part time and housewives, the trend was different...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...the trend was different. While employed part time women and housewives women had 40 hours...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47928994083 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15894448286 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5394579938 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323142988887 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189737110563 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154388019207 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266147067973 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158175421261 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.