The provided chart depicts how often society of the USA ate fast food meals in 2003, 2006 and 2013. As its seen from the chart, frequency of eating fast food is very popular between people in the USA on regular basis.
According to the data shown, almost 3 of 10 people in the USA had a fast food meal at least once a week in 2003 and 2006 ( about 31 per cent, almost 35 per cent), followed by slight decrease to just under 30 per cent in 2013. Participants of research who ate meals prepared in fast food restaurants once or twice a month had a zig-zag results within a decade. In 2006 five percent less than in 2003 ate fast food meals (25%, 30%), followed by sharp increase to nearly below 35 per cent in 2013.
Getting back to the details, two groups of participants who ate fast food meals every day or never remained almost same over the decade just under five per cent.
- Some people assert that it is good for students to have part time-jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The Level of Air Pollution in Five Countries 58
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting event bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and include your opinion, supported by examples 78
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al at least once a week in 2003 and 2006 about 31 per cent, almost 35 per cent, f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.26506024096 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10901885169 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.8932603609 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372576084424 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211948876665 0.103423049105 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109928618673 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271403245898 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163255660169 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.