The bar chart provides information on the proportion of American's had eaten convenient food at restaurants over a period of ten years from 2003.
It can be seen from the graph that the remarkable number of people had taken fast food during once a week at around 33% in 2006 and 31% in 2003, while the figure in 2013 was just 27% respectively. But at the same time, in terms of once or twice a month visitors' intake was slightly lower except in 2013. However, the people who had intake food at eateries for few times a year was relatively less than many times taking food at week. When the former had visited less than 15% , the latter was just under 20% throughout the given period.
In contrast, the figure for daily visitor to food corners was significantly less. There were only 5% of people had consumed during the given period. Interestingly, none of them had taken any kind of junk food from 2003 to 2013, it was well under mere 5% .
All in all,it is clear from the graph that the percentage of people visited fast food corner was remarkably much higher in once in a week and once or twice a month than regular visitors.
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purposes of museum is to educate. discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extend do you agree are disagree? 61
- The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think this is happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? 56
- The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changed have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive.What are you opinions on this? 61
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hen the former had visited less than 15% , the latter was just under 20% throughou...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 2003 to 2013, it was well under mere 5% . All in all,it is clear from the gra...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3 to 2013, it was well under mere 5% . All in all,it is clear from the graph th...
^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... was well under mere 5% . All in all,it is clear from the graph that the percen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, well, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48309178744 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36944060023 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8966983584 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181609963197 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817114032519 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049681864081 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122407509275 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023316079089 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.