The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The vertical bar chart elucidates the information regarding the level of food consumption by USA residents in the fast food hotels measured in percentage in the years 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, the bar graph outlines that over the three years a large proportion of the public opted to enjoy their snack food once in a week, once or twice a month and several times a week in eateries. However, the public who come under the categories of visiting a cafeteria a few times in a year, every day and those never accounted for a very low rate all in all.
In the beginning years 2003 and 2006, the public who dined once a week in snack bars depicted a fair proportion of about 31% and 33%, and those who dined several times a week were nearly 16% and 20% individually. Alternatively, the count of residents witnessed extremely lower rates for categories every day and never with approximately less than 5% for both.
In contrast, for the year 2013, it was observed that people reduced their consumption of outside food from every day(3%) to once a week(27%), and it reached a peak of over a third(34%) for those who choose once or twice in a month group which was a 9% rise from 2006. Additionally, the public who preferred a few times a year depicted the same rate of about more than one tenth as in the previous year 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-31 | bangtaenie_77 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 56
- The map shows the plan of a library in 2001 and 2009 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The maps below changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where relevant 86
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In the beginning years 2003 and 2006, the public who dined once a week in snac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.525 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56567892249 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2553129122 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.142857143 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0661744405816 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384074556803 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637639073464 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062422919444 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074368974873 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.