The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010.
The chart reveals how physically active Australian males and females in six categories were regularly in the year of 2010. Overall, women were almost physically active more than their counterparts. Additionally, the figure for women aged 45-54 was the highest while that for men aged 35-44 was the lowest over the year surveyed.
It can be seen that the rate of males exercised witnessed an only higher value than that of females in the category of the 15-to 24-year-olds, 52.8% compared with 47.7%. Regarding remaining age groups, the significant difference can be seen in people aged between 35 and 44. To be exact, the proportion of females who did activity was 13% more than males did, 52.5% as opposed to 39.5%. However, the figure for people aged 65 and over was identical, standing at approximately 47.1% for each. In terms of two categories of those in ages of 45-54 and 55-64, the rate of both genders did exercise was almost equal, at the average of 53% and 44% on each female’s group and each male’s one respectively. There was a negligible proportion in the group of ages 25 and 34, 48.9% belonged to the figure for women and 42.2% went to that for men.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
2024-02-20 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75980392157 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6310472535 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7990136392 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139872525507 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744480689862 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102234845339 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162898474969 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129051710965 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.