The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011.
The given pie charts provide a comparison of various paradigms of disposal waste in one nation between 1960 and 2011.
From an overall perspective, it is apparent that most disposed wastes experienced an upward trend over a 51-year period except for textiles, glass, paper, and others. Noticeably, paper wastes hosted the first rank in 1960 while this top was replaced by food in 2011.
According to the data in 1960, paper accounted for one-quarter of all waste while this proportion declined by exactly 10% after 51 years. Following that, there was a decrease in textile elements from 17 percent in 1960 to 11 percent in 2011. Subsequently, the latter proportion of wood waste was roughly less than 2 times when compared with the former. However, the period saw an increase in food waste, which raised by 9 percent and became the highest rank in 2011.
While there was an upward and downward trend over the period, the share of glass, metal, and green waste remained unchanged after 51 years. Moreover, there was a dramatic upsurge in plastic waste, which grew by 10 percent and stood at the second-highest rank in 2011. Finally, the share of other material wastes declined by double once compared with the initial percentage.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 84
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.961352657 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54881168203 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7544931598 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194671586509 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851572915502 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743585897441 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150394115506 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838572666938 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.