The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050

The given list of charts details the proportional change in the population of Italy and Yemen in 2000 along with future projections over a period of 50 years.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that due to the majority of the mature population, Italy is predicted to witness a significant rise in the proportional rate of aged people. However, with the opposite trend, Yemen will observe a slight rise in the aged population while a sharp rise in the number of adults and children.

According to the given illustration, in 2000, over half of the population in Yemen were young children below 14 years of age, and about 2 in every 5 people reported were adults(15-59 years). However, just 3.6% of the total population fell into the category of old people. In contrast, whilst nearly 3 out of 5 people in Italy belonged to age-group 15-59, just below a quarter recorded as aged and merely 14.3% were children.

Turning to predictions, after a period of 5 decades, with a slight uptick of 10%, Yemen will experience an upward trend in the adult's number, while Italy is expected to plummet sharply by 15% for the same. Also, a dramatic rise is predicted to soar the number of aged people to two-fifths of the total population, which will be up by nearly 37% compared to Yemen. However, the percentage of children is predicted to be low by 13% and 3% respectively in Yemen and Italy by the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70634920635 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73618520912 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5212605086 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.777777778 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295122559664 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121216028881 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067812071106 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186068458677 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640332848918 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.