The diagrams show statistic information regarding the ages of the habitants of Yermen and Italy in 2000 and also a estimative for 2050.
We can see that in 2000 the majority of people in Yemen was between 0 and 14 years old, whith 50.1%, whereas in Italy most of the population was between 15- 59 years old (61.6%), in the same year. On the other hand, just 3.6% of people in the former country was 60 years old or more in 2000, while in the latter country this figure is represented with 24.1%.
The projections for 2050 show that the number of people with 15-59 years and 60 years or more will increase in Yemen, reaching 57.3% and 5.7% respectively. In contrast, in Italy, the population with 15-59 years will decrease to 46.2%, while people with 60 years or more will grow to 42.3%.
Overall, it is possible to see that there is an upward trend on the rates of people with 60 years or more in both countries.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comp 73
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005 2006 2007 and 2008 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ts of Yermen and Italy in 2000 and also a estimative for 2050. We can see that ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40828402367 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31985868895 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.3499940519 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124413606057 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786505681539 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753778888873 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969328161645 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811047127137 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.