The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the age profile of Yemenis and Italians in 2000 and its predictions in 2050.
In 2000, Yemen was almost equally dominated with children and people aged 15-59 with only slight difference on percentage by latter was 46.3% and former was 50.1%. Nonetheless, it is projected that the number of children will experience a fall to 37%, while the number of young people is predicted to rise sharply to 57.5%. Besides, the figure of older people contributed the least in 2000 with only 3.6% and will not significantly change in 2050 by just raising up to 5.7%.
Italy was largely dominated by young people at 15-59 years of age with 61.6%, followed with elderly people at the age of over 60 by around a quarter portion, and finally children aged 0-14 with 14.3%. Nevertheless, the number of young people is forecast to be dramatically plummeted to 46.2% in 2050; as the opposite of the figure of old people’s trend with the expectation of marked increase up to 42.3%. On the other side, the number of people aged 0-14 is about to be only declined gradually from 14.3% to 11.5% in 50 years.
In summary, both of Yemen and Italy are going to see similar trend in the change of population number. The number in majority group is expected to fall, while the number in second majority will become the major proportion. Meanwhile, the minority of the age group is forecast to not undergo big change in percentage.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
- The problem of poor teacher performance that has plagued the state public school system is bound to become a good deal less serious in the future. The state has initiated comprehensive guidelines that oblige state teachers to complete a number of required 50
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 77
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77510040161 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61008338596 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4339954861 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110665359503 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541002826747 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427295311752 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866372408168 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383511877259 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.