The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie charts illustrate the changes in different ageing sectors of populations in two countries Yemen and Italy, in the period from 2000 to 2050. The units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the charts depict chances in percentage of three different age groups in two countries. In Yemen, in 2000, half of the population was between 0-14 year old children, remaining half portion was 15-59 and over 60 year old. Whereas, these age groups percentage will have been increased in 2050. But the proportion of teenager will decline. Whilst, in Italy, in both year (2000 and 2050) these populations have been trend to upward. However, in all four charts middle age ratio has been almost higher than other two groups.
In Yemen a number of habitants ageing from 0-14year old accounted for half of population ,(50.1%) in 2000, but over a third (37.0%) of portion will have declined in 2050. In the contrast, 15-59 and 60 aged groups population experienced an upward trend than in 2000 (46.3% to 57.3% and 3.6% to 5.7%).
In comparison, in Italy, during 2000 year, all three types of age groups had shown increase in their population, than in Yemen. But this percentage will have some variations, 0-14 adolescents with 11.5%, 46.2% 15-59 year adults and over 60 year elder just over 42%. Respectively. However, throughout the period, in Yemen, 60+ people have been less but in Italy increased in average level.
- The chart shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 to 2002. 11
- The graph below shows the unemployment rate in each country of the united kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifferent age groups in two countries. In Yemen, in 2000, half of the population w...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 0-14 year old children, remaining half portion was 15-59 and over 60 year old. ...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...portion was 15-59 and over 60 year old. Whereas, these age groups percentage will have ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st, in Italy, in both year 2000 and 2050 these populations have been trend to upw...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ear old accounted for half of population ,50.1% in 2000, but over a third 37.0% of...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...000 46.3% to 57.3% and 3.6% to 5.7%. In comparison, in Italy, during 2000 year,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95780590717 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5267744981 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523206751055 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6024045561 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3846153846 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278933206562 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105379986502 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806380134787 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202163955413 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638277900234 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.