The given two line graphs delineate the data regarding how much time spent on household chores and how ownership were changing according to electrical things in one nation from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, it can be seen that, the number of hours per week was showing downward trend whereas, the percentage of household with electrical appliances was increased along the period.
It is crystal clear that, in 1920 the proportion of refrigerator starts from 0% and reached 100% between 1920 ans 2019. A dramatic increase was observed in the percentage of refrigerator. From 1980 to 2019 the percentage of fridge was remained same at 100%. However, the similar criteria was followed by vacuum cleaners which begun at 30% and accounted 100% in 2019. On the contrary, washing machine was the merely gadget which had slight decrease in 1960. After that it rose up and reached near about 72%
Moving Further, maximum time spent on housework such as washing clothes, preparing meals and cleaning was around 50 hours per week in 1920. Following this, the number of hours per week was decline rapidly and reached 10 hours per week in 2019.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature
- Task 1 IELTS Writing Model Cambridge 8 Test 4 Goods transported in UK 1974 2002 my friends version 67
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 79
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 56
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss the advantages and disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, whereas, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97368421053 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49154248078 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626315789474 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5101028892 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162812320754 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635766917297 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632029595331 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107421417137 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578017125192 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.