The provided bar charts give information about the average educational years, the number of scientists and technicians, and the expenditure on investigation and development in two discrepant types of nations from 1980 to 1990.
Overall, there was an upward trend in all examined categories in both genres of countries except for a decline in the amount of money spent on researching and thriving in developing countries. Additionally, the figures for industrialized nations were always higher than those of developing countries over the given years.
Turning to the details, in 1980, people in industrialized countries participated in schools for approximately 9 years, which was almost three times higher than that of developing countries ( about 3 years) registered concurrently. In the next 10 years, the figure for industrialized nations went up gradually to nearly 11 years, compared with only nearly 4 years in the developing countries.
Regarding the number of people working in science and technology, there was a significant growth from just over 40 per 1000 people in 1980 to around 70 per 1000 people in 1990 in industrialized nations in comparison to just a slight increase from 10 to 17 per 1000 people in developing countries. Meanwhile, about 350 billion us dollars was invested in research and development in industrialized countries in 1990, by contrast, the figure for developing countries was only less than 20 billion us dollars.
- The graph below shows Long Term International Migration in UK 1999 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 92
- Many people say the gap between the rich and the poor people is wider as rich people become richer poor people become poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address these problems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...higher than that of developing countries about 3 years registered concurrently. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39473684211 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24082149718 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530701754386 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.830733898 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.714285714 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5714285714 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220034814067 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107696870909 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529311429996 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139105332499 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314245924858 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.