The two bar charts provide information about people aims for study in different ages and their boss supports with this group.
The first bar chart shows that there is approximately a direct relationship between study for interest and age. On the other hand by increasing age, study for having a job are decreasing. As chart illustrates the maximum proportion (80%) is related to under 26 years old students that choose study for career and this proportion is decreasing by increasing age and it reaches to its minimum proportion (20%) for over 49 years old people. However, by rising age reasons for study change from career to interest gradually, and the minimum proportion is for under 26 years old in 10% and the maximum proportion is foe over 49 years old in 70%.
The second bar chart shows that the employer supports for under 26 years old students have maximum proportion in over 60% and 30-39 years old students have the minimum chance of supporting from their bosses in approximately 35%. It is obvious that 26-29 years old, over 49 years old and 40-49 years old dedicate second to fourth places respectively for themselves.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective.Comics, books, radio, television, film, theaterGive reasons for your answer and include any releva 56
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture Write a letter to your landlord In your letterintroduce yourselfexplain what is wrong with the furnit 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88601036269 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61852387674 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497409326425 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.867540863 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166928046268 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11125468613 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563882264704 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145485405604 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549471522324 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.