The bar charts illustrate the number of urban citizens and rural ones in Europe who were impacted by noise from traffic, trains, aircraft, and industry during the day and at night in 2007
Overall, it is clear that people in both areas suffered from noise pollution in the day more than at night and traffic generated the largest noise
Traffic noise during the day and at night in cities was very common, affecting 64 million and 48 million residents, respectively. Rural figures for traffic noise were relatively high, with 34 million and 24 million. Turning to noise from trains, in cities 10 million individuals were impacted in the day and 8 million at night, in rural regions, it witnessed that each group was less than 2 million compared to that in cities (8 million and 6 million)
Aircraft and industry impacted insignificantly on people in cities and rural, it was just 4 million urban citizens were influenced by aircraft noise during the day and 1 million at night, while in rural areas, there were 2 million and 1 million people who heard noise from aircraft. In terms of industrial noise, the data was very low in cities and did not affect rural residents.
- Parents should encourage their children to spend less time on studying and more time on physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below show the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people while others say that technology has the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts below give information on Internet use at home in Australia between 2010 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78325123153 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51760285837 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477832512315 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.4926829268 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 201.104916648 43.030603864 467% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 242.75 112.824112599 215% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.75 22.9334400587 221% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324886003673 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196783545642 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103852101124 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23605210022 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619129507662 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.5 13.2329268293 200% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.65 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 10.3012195122 198% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.9970731707 200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.