The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of people volunteering in various kinds of organisations, namely Environmental, Art, Health Care, Sport, Educational and Others, between 2008 and 2014.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that while volunteers' participation in environmental, sport and health care groups increased, the opposite was true for the other kinds of institutions. Additionally, the percentage of health care volunteers were the lowest during the two years.
In 2008, the number of people who chose educational foundations as a place to volunteer was the highest, accounted for 24%, followed by Art and Others at 18% and 15% respectively. Over the four years ensuing, all three types of volunteering witnessed a significant decrease. The amount of volunteers in educational organisations decreased violently to 17%. Meanwhile, 6% was the reduction of both art and other organizations.
Regarding the remaining three associations, the proportion of volunteers in environmental unions stood second place with at 21% and three times higher than that of Health Care establishments with the number as 7%, 15% of all volunteers attended to sport organisations in 2004. Four years later, the quantity of people who volunteer in Environmental and Sport institutions dramatically grew with increases of 8% and 10% sequentially while the figure for Health Care groups trivially rose to 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 84
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of those developments outweigh the disadvantages 84
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree of disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40815044471 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562790697674 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1744975487 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.777777778 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169646034149 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754288700215 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534440343471 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115123687247 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479152779419 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40815044471 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562790697674 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1744975487 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.777777778 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169646034149 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754288700215 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534440343471 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115123687247 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479152779419 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.