The given pie charts illustrate the percentages of students studying in one of the British universities who could converse in other languages besides English in two separate years.
Overall, Spanish was the most commonly spoken language in both years. While there was a rise in the proportion of students who were able to speak in spanish only, another language and two other languages, there were corresponding drops in the proportion of those who could speak in English, French and German only.
The proportion of students who could speak in Spanish only saw a growth of five points, growing from 30 percent in 2000 to 35 percent by the end of the period. Likewise, 3 out of 20 students could converse in another languages in 2000. However, this ratio inclined to one out five over a decade.
By contrast, English only speakers accounted for 20 percent of the total British students in 2000 but this proportion plummeted by half to hover at exactly 10 percent by 2010. In comparison, the proportion of German only speakers' remained unchanged at 10 percent in both years while the proportion of the French only group dived to 10 percent over the course of a decade, a massive drop of 50 percent
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transport in the UK between 1974 to 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportions of the world s oil resources held in different areas together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 200 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the proportion of German only speakers remained unchanged at 10 percent in both...
^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 10 percent over the course of a decade, a massive drop of 50 percent
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84951456311 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64210150236 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485436893204 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6977427615 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342831235163 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14370589542 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115373825112 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217163353188 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910657474984 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.