The given pie charts illustrate information about the percentages of British students who could speak other languages except for English in year 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of students who were able to use other languages had a significant increase within a decade. However, British students who were able to speak French declined considerably.
Looking into more details, 30% of British students at one university could speak Spanish in 2000, making it the highest percentage among other languages. In addition, the figure for no other languages was the second highest, at 20%. Nevertheless, students who were able to speak French and another language accounted for 15%, while only 10% of students could use German and two other languages.
However, the figure for no other languages somehow dropped dramatically within 10 years, while the other figures showed a remarkable growth in variety degrees except for French and German. In 2010, students who were able to speak two other languages, another language and Spanish had a considerable increase of 5%, at 15%, 20% and 35% respectively. Meanwhile, the figure for German remained the same, at 10%, while French speakers and students who spoke English only dropped moderately by 5%.
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 35
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30198019802 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71693794354 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5510413801 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456801482758 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218581558493 0.103423049105 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834004729812 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315947147217 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400349058896 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.