The given bar chart gives information about the main reasons for travelling purpose in the US in the year 2009. Meanwhile, the pie chart illustrates different problems related to travelling public.
Overall, it is obvious that the US people mainly travelled for commuting to the workplaces. In addition, increasing the price of travel was the most prominent issue due to public transportation.
According to the data based on the chart, reasons explaining for moving purpose were divided into 5 separate groups. To be specific, the majority of citizens in the US went out with a view to working, accounting for nearly a half of the total. Besides, personal reasons, shopping and social/recreation purposes were responsible for lower proportions of travelling purpose, with 19%, 16% and 10%, respectively. It can also be seen that people did not have a tendency to visit their friends and relatives' houses, with the figure was only 6% of the total.
Furthermore, there were numerous issues resulting from travelling public. This phenomenon mainly associated with the rise in the expenditure on travel, with 36%, followed by current safety concerns and aggressive drivers, with 19% for the former and 17% for the latter. While US people were relatively afraid of highway congestion, accounting for 14% of the total, some problems involving the convenience to public transport and space for pedestrians seemed to be not act as deterrents for using public infrastructure in the US, only took up 8% and 6% respectively.
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 84
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 93
- The number of people being sent to prison is increasing year on year While some people believe prisons are the best way to tackle crime others suggest that community service is successful Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The diagram below shows how the leather goods are produced 84
- The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22131147541 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05050209321 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614754098361 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6875210122 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.818181818 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491575279829 0.215688989381 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195624937103 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10761565317 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340815915032 0.15604864568 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100227632976 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.